A Fairer Society is a Freer Society

Britain today lies in the grip of austerity. Welfare cuts, unemployment, a shrinking public sector and hostility to the poor are some of the aspects of this austerity. This period of economic difficulty is only the latest chapter in a thirty year project that has seen a rapid expansion in the reach of the free market, as well as an equally rapid rise in inequalities between wealth, power and freedom. Despite such vast inequalities, many politicians seem to be unprepared to challenge them and make the case for social justice.


What Britain needs is a viable alternative to the free market discourse that has dominated our politics since Margaret Thatcher came to power in 1979. At the heart of any discourse lie values and convictions. Thatcherism’s political values are market deregulation, individual responsibility, privatisation, low taxes and low government spending. Unfortunately since the time of Tony Blair, the progressive left has been an almost value free zone that lacks conviction, a hunger for change and the radical edge that made it such a dynamic force in the twentieth century.


Where might the centre-left rediscover its radical edge? What perspective offers Britain a fairer future in the twenty first century? The two ideological giants dominated the twentieth century; state socialism and neoliberalism. State socialism while offering greater equality, overlooked the vast inequality of power between its centralised authoritarian government and the individual citizen. These tendencies often lead to civil liberties being neglected. On the other hand, neoliberalism, the right wing philosophy of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan while promoting market freedoms did not promote social freedoms. As a result the wealth gap between the rich and the poor grew and social justice went into decline. The ideology that offers a viable alternative to Thatcherism must balance civil liberties with social justice, a point of view that can equally promote freedom and fairness.


Social liberalism is a centre-left political theory that has at its core, the belief that social justice is needed to enable the freedom of the individual. This was the philosophy of great centre-left progressives such as L.T. Hobhouse, David Lloyd George, John Maynard Keynes, William Beveridge and John Rawls. Classical liberalism while supporting individual liberties and equal rights has often neglected social liberty.


Social liberty is the freedom for the individual to develop free from the constraints of poverty, ignorance, conformity, unemployment, disability and poor health. Social liberalism with its focus on social liberty believes that individual freedom and social justice go hand in hand and are mutually beneficial to each other. This leads social liberals to ensure that everyone has the opportunity to get a good education, to get good healthcare and to get a good job with decent pay. Modern social liberal policies include: a living wage, a land value tax, employee ownership, ending the “bedroom tax”, reversing the marketisation of the NHS and having a “Green People’s Budget” that would focus on redistribution and green growth. In short, social liberalism is the belief that a fairer society is a freer society.


The historic responsibility of social liberalism has been to humanise capitalism through promoting the redistribution of wealth and equal opportunities. To achieve social justice in a market economy requires a Keynesian focus on tackling unemployment and stimulating economic growth. Britain’s current economy with its high levels of unemployment, stagnate growth and increased social insecurity is unsustainable. Only a revival of Keynesian principles can prevent long term social and economic decline.


A social liberal capitalism should aim to redress the imbalance of power in the market economy. More co-operatives, mutuals and greater employee ownership are needed to achieve this. Employee ownership gives workers the ability to have a genuine say and stake in their companies and to have a right to be represented on their company boards. A fairer society requires a capitalism that focuses on social justice, environmental protection and employee ownership.


The economics of Thatcherite austerity are void of social justice. We now live in a terrible situation where the political mainstream is almost afraid to defend the interests of the poor and the vulnerable. Britain must regain a social consciousness that believes in redistributing wealth and protecting the poorest and most vulnerable members of society.  Social liberals must be driven by a sense of mission to create a society with the greatest possible balance between individual freedom and social justice.  Social justice is vital to free the poorest members of society from poverty, which in turn enables them to live their lives and take advantage of the opportunities we all take for granted. This is because ultimately, a fairer society is a freer society.


Tagged with: , ,
Posted in SLF blog
7 comments on “A Fairer Society is a Freer Society
  1. John Carlisle says:

    I agree with most of your views, which reflect the Attlee party view that brought in the mechanisms to combat social injustice. However, our greatest lack is the politicians’ utter ignorance of how good organisations really work – no matter what sector they are in. This is wilful blindness. It allows the Tories to get away with murder on the economic front because we do not have a model that challenges their (untested) assumptions.
    It is also irresponsible in the extreme. If you buy a racing stable you sure as hell would study what makes for champion racer.
    I recommend, humbly, that you get a copy of John Kay’s June talk at the LSE on Capitalism in which he states that capitalism is no longer helpful as a framework for thinking about the economy as the economic significance and value of capital markets are greatly overstated. So, being pro-market is not the same as being pro-business as the real market economy is that for the production and consumption of goods and services, namely, wealth creation. The Left has failed to grasp this 21st century distinction and has been suckered into thinking that business as a money maker for external shareholders is OK. The question is, for them, how much, rather than the principle itself which you infer by propagating the value of co-ops, mutuals and employee- owned companies.
    When the Social Liberals have agreed the model of the “firm” then we can take on the Tories in the party, and convince them to rescue, among others, the NHS; which can be saved on by applying sound, liberal, economic principles.

  2. Ed Mander says:

    Wise words, actually sounds like proper Liberalism!

  3. I agree very much with the sentiment of this article. It fits very nicely into the ‘A stronger economy in a fairer society’ the new slogan of the LibDems. The main difficulty politically is that to help the poorer members of society, the majority will have to pay more and those that campaign on behalf of the poor are never satisfied.

  4. I missed the first few words. Britain today does NOT lie in the grip of austerity! All the signs are that the country is starting the long haul back to prosperity. The information demonstrating this is publicly available but so far is restricted to the business pages of newspapers and TV channels like Bloomberg News. This in no way alters the main thrust of the article and my comment.

  5. John Carlisle says:

    Why is my comment awaiting moderation after 24 hours?

    • prateekbuch says:

      John – simply because this site, and the whole organisation, is run by volunteers who cannot monitor the comments as efficiently as we would like in addition to the rest of the work we do…! no conspiracy :-)

      • John Carlisle says:

        good to hear from you, under whatever guise. I am a big fan! See you tomorrow I hope.

        You need not publish this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Follow us on Twitter

Blog archive